000			02220ctm a22003374a 4500
001			12869967
005			20250312110627.0
006
007			ta
008			180111s2002 gau b 001 0 eng
010			_a 2002011760
020			_a1589830490 (pbk. : alk. paper)
040			_aDLC _cDLC _dDLC
042			_apcc
050	0	0	_aBS2795.52 _bG55 2002b
082	0	0	_a227/.93066 _221
100	1		_aGilmour, Michael J.
245	1	4	_aThe significance of parallels between 2 Peter and other early Christian literature / _h[manuscript] / _cby Michael J. Gilmour.
260			_aAtlanta : _bSociety of Biblical Literature, _cc2002.
300			_axi, 176 p. ; _c23 cm.
440		0	_aAcademia Biblica ; _v10
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 161-171) and index.
505	0		_aIntroduction -- The location of 2 Peter -- Criteria for determining the value of parallels -- Analysis of 2 Peter -- Evaluation of the parallels approach for locating texts -- Appendix one: Hints of Homer in Luke 16:19-31? -- Appendix two: How to approach a strange manuscript : a novel('s) look at the historical task -- Appendix three: What constitutes a parallel? -- Appendix four: Factors that lend weight to arguments claiming that parallels are due to literary dependence -- Appendix five: Complications with source theories : factors that weaken claims of literary dependence, lead to mistaken claims of literary dependence, or obscure real dependence -- Appendix six: Conclusions possible on the basis of parallels -- Appendix seven: Parallels that are not reliable for reaching conclusions about dependency -- Appendix eight: Richard Hays' criteria for determining the presence of an intertextual echo.
630	0	0	_aBible. _pPeter, 2nd _xCriticism, Textual.
830		0	_aAcademia Biblica (Series) (Society of Biblical Literature) ; _vno. 10.
906			_a7 _bcbc _corignew _d1 _eecip _f20 _gy-gencatlg
925	0		_aacquire _b2 shelf copies _xpolicy default
942			_cBK
955			_dsh06 2002-07-31; _esh42 2002-08-02 to Dewey _fsh17 2002-11-13 _gsh17 2002-11-13 to BCCD;
961	w	l	_t8
999			_c9065 _d9065