000 02954ctm a22003977i 4500
001 19126260
003 OSt
005 20250529164623.0
007 ta
008 170510s2015 mnuc b 001 0 eng d
010 _a 2015510523
020 _a9781451464702 (pbk)
_q(pbk. ;
_qalk. paper)
020 _a1451464703
_q(pbk. ;
_qalk. paper)
035 _a(OCoLC)ocn898166584
040 _aBTCTA
_beng
_cBTCTA
_erda
_dYDXCP
_dBDX
_dFIN
_dLMR
_dCDX
_dDTM
_dOCLCF
_dLNT
_dOCLCQ
_dDLC
042 _alccopycat
050 0 0 _aBT160
_b.S42 2015
082 0 4 _a231.8 Sco 2015
_223
100 1 _aScott, Mark S. M.,
_eauthor.
245 1 0 _aPathways in theodicy :
_ban introduction to the problem of evil /
_cMark S.M. Scott.
260 _bFortress Press; ;
_aMinneapolis:,
_cc2015.
264 1 _aMinneapolis [Minnesota] :
_bFortress Press,
_c[2015]
264 4 _c♭2015
300 _axiii, 232 pages :
_bportrait ;
_c23 cm.
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _aunmediated
_bn
_2rdamedia
338 _avolume
_bnc
_2rdacarrier
504 _aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 217-224) and index.
505 0 0 _tRethinking evil : from ontology to theology --
_tRedefining theodicy : expanding the boundaries --
_tFree will defense : playing the blame game --
_tSoul-making theodicy : no pain, no gain --
_tProcess theodicy : denying divine omnipotence --
_tCruciform theodicy : divine solidarity through the cross --
_tAntitheodicy : intellectual and moral critiques --
_tBeyond theodicy : the afterlife and mystery.
520 _aWhy does God permit senseless suffering? If God is good and all-powerful, why does evil exist? The problem of evil perennially vexes theology, but many theologians have abandoned the project of theodicy, or the theological explanation of evil, as either fruitless or hopeless. Academic studies on theodicy, moreover, typically succumb to theological deficiency and abstraction, often devoid of any concrete connection to Christian life and practice. In Pathways in Theodicy, designed for students and scholars alike, Mark S.M. Scott reinvigorates stalled debates in philosophy and theology through a detailed reassessment of the problem of evil and the task of theodicy and through a careful analysis of the major models and motifs in theodicy. Scott explores the strengths and weaknesses of classic and contemporary perspectives on the problem of evil and invites readers to assess the cogency and relevance of each on their own. Rather than promoting a single perspective, Pathways in Theodicy explores the plurality of options available to treat the problem of evil and the provisional and tentative nature of theodicy, which searches not for final, definitive solutions but for viable ways to move the conversation forward.
650 0 _aGood and evil.
650 0 _aTheodicy.
906 _a7
_bcbc
_ccopycat
_d2
_encip
_f20
_gy-gencatlg
942 _cBK
_2ddc
999 _c6825
_d6825