01819ctm a22002654a 45000010009000000050017000090060001000260070003000270080041000300100017000710200035000880400018001230420008001410500025001490820019001741000024001932450129002172600055003463000025004014400027004265040064004535050918005176300044014358300074014791286996720250312110627.0ta180111s2002    gau      b    001 0 eng    a  2002011760  a1589830490 (pbk. : alk. paper)  aDLCcDLCdDLC  apcc00aBS2795.52bG55 2002b00a227/.930662211 aGilmour, Michael J.14aThe significance of parallels between 2 Peter and other early Christian literature /h[manuscript] /cby Michael J. Gilmour.  aAtlanta :bSociety of Biblical Literature,cc2002.  axi, 176 p. ;c23 cm. 0aAcademia Biblica ;v10  aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 161-171) and index.0 aIntroduction -- The location of 2 Peter -- Criteria for determining the value of parallels -- Analysis of 2 Peter -- Evaluation of the parallels  approach for locating texts -- Appendix one: Hints of Homer in Luke 16:19-31? -- Appendix two: How to approach a strange manuscript : a novel('s) look at the historical task -- Appendix three: What constitutes a parallel? -- Appendix four: Factors that lend weight to arguments claiming that parallels are due to literary dependence -- Appendix five: Complications with source theories : factors that weaken claims of literary dependence, lead to mistaken claims of literary dependence, or obscure real dependence -- Appendix six: Conclusions possible on the basis of parallels -- Appendix seven: Parallels that are not reliable for  reaching conclusions about dependency -- Appendix eight: Richard Hays' criteria for determining the presence of an intertextual echo.00aBible.pPeter, 2ndxCriticism, Textual. 0aAcademia Biblica (Series) (Society of Biblical Literature) ;vno. 10.